Coleman v. Home Health Resources Inc.
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Neil V. Wake, Senior United States District Judge
Before the Court are the Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendants Home Health Resources, Inc. and The Crossing: *938Hospice Care, Inc., (Doc. 82) the Response, and the Reply.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The following facts are construed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, who is the non-moving party.
Defendants are companies who provide hospice care and home nursing services to patients in Arizona. (Doc. 82 at 2.) Plaintiff Norma Coleman is 'a seventy-six-year-old African-American woman who worked for Defendants (she was jointly employed by…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Aziz Aityahia v. Envoy Air Incorporated, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2026
- Barstad v. Mid States IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
- Buhagiar v. Wells Fargo Bank NADistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
- Caracofe v. Drake Kryterion IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- Grubbs v. Arizona, State ofDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.