Legal Opinion
United States v. Farese
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided April 16, 2001No. 98-4909, 98-5004PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARNES, Circuit Judge:
Appellants Thomas Farese and Frank DeRosa pleaded guilty to one count of conspiring to participate in the affairs of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering. 1 The district court sentenced them pursuant to IJ.S.S.G. § 2S1.1, the provision applicable to the offense of money laundering. They contend the district court erred by sentencing them under that guideline provision because they did not commit the crime of money laundering, and Farese also contends the court should not have enhanced his sentence based on his role as an organizer or leader of the racketeering…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Charles A. Castle v. Sangamo Weston, Inc., a Corporation, Chris Papastrat, Shelby Bass v. Sangamo Weston, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- United States v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Michael CoiroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Filemon Arzate-NunezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Kevin McKinley Seamus Moley, Joseph McColganCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. YannottiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- United States v. George A. VallejoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. NaranjoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Smith, Arnett C.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- United States v. DvorakCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.