Legal Opinion
United States v. Naranjo
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided March 2, 2011No. 08-13814PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRYOR, Circuit Judge:
The main issue in this appeal is whether there is sufficient evidence to support Mario Naranjo’s convictions for concealment money laundering related to his operation of a Ponzi scheme that caused over one hundred victims to lose collectively over $2.7 million. The government presented evidence that Naranjo made three large cash withdrawals from bank accounts that contained fraudulently obtained proceeds of the Ponzi scheme and that Naranjo attempted to hide his association with the account holders. Viewed in the light most favorable to the government, this evidence…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Marvin BakerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Anthony Antone, Manuel Gispert, Larry Neil Miller, Frank Diecidue, A/K/A "The Under Boss," Frank Boni, Jr., and Homer Rex DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- United States v. BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. LangfordCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. CameronCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Mitchell J. SteinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- United States v. TobinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.