Legal Opinion
Claysburg II Towers v. Claysburg
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided October 30, 1996No. 5:95 CV 075Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NUGENT, District Judge.
Pursuant to the Memorandum and Opinion filed simultaneously herewith, this Court holds that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that Defendants are entitled to summary judgment in their favor as a matter of law pursuant to Fed.R.CivP. 56(c). Therefore, the Motion of Defendants for Summary Judgment (Doc. #9) is GRANTED.
In addition, Defendant’s Amended Request for Relief in Pending Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 42) is DENIED.
Accordingly, this matter is DISMISSED in its entirety.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
This case is before the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Clarence Erwin Copeland v. Mark MacHulis James StephensCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.