Legal Opinion

Bowerman v. MacDonald

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1988No. Docket Nos. 80273, 80424, (Calendar Nos. 4-5)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrickley, J.

We granted leave in these two cases limited to three issues. First, whether a search warrant or an evidentiary hearing is necessary prior to a trial court’s order of a blood test in a paternity case. Second, whether a defendant father in a paternity case may be held in contempt where he refuses to submit to a blood test. Third, whether a default judgment may be entered in favor of a plaintiff mother in a paternity case where the defendant refuses to submit to a blood test.

We hold that where the mother of a child files a verified complaint in accordance with § 4 of the Paternity Act, 1 neither…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Clark v. JeterSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. City of Grand Rapids v. CrockerMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Dussia v. Monroe County Employees Retirement SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 1971

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Girard v. WagenmakerMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Mead v. BatchlorMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In Interest of JMSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  4. Doe v. SenechalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  5. Larrabee v. SachsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API