City of New Albany v. Ray
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Floyd Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Crumpacker, J. —
Ray sued the city of New Albany for wrongfully collecting a large body of surface water upon a public alley, by artificial means, without providing any out*322let theréfor, whereby the plaintiff’s premises were overflowed and damaged.
There are three paragraphs of complaint, to each of which a demurrer was' filed and overruled. An answer was filed and the cause was tried by a jury. A verdict was returned in favor of the plaintiff, upon which judgment was rendered.
The first question for decision arises upon the demurrer to the first paragraph of complaint.
It is insisted that this…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Weis v. City of MadisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- City of North Vernon v. VoeglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Dodge v. GaylordIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- City of Teree Haute v. HudnutIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- City of Evansville v. DeckerIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hamilton v. HannemanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
- Romine v. Evansville & Terre Haute RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
- Kelly v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
- Modern Woodmen of America v. JonesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Town of Thorntown v. FugateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.