Legal Opinion

United States v. Grindstaff

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided July 28, 1978No. CR-2-78-20PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDA OPINIONS AND ORDERS

NEESE, District Judge.

The defendant Mr. Grindstaff moved the Court to dismiss the indictment herein on the ground that same was not returned until 13 to 14 months after the offenses charged therein are alleged to have occurred. The defendant, not having established that any such preindictment delay was in fact significantly prejudicial to him and that the government acted in bad faith in connection with the delay so as to gain an unfair tactical advantage, the motion hereby is

DENIED. United States v. Lovasco (1977), 431 U.S. 783, 97 S.Ct. 2044, 52 L.Ed.2d 752;…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. DavidsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  2. United States v. RameyDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1981
  3. United States v. BallDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API