United States v. Ball
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NEESE, District Judge.
The defendant moved pretrial, “ * * * pursuant to T.C.A. [§§] 40-2044, 40-2441, and the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963) * * *,” for an order requiring certain discovery of the prosecution. Such motion lacks merit and hereby is
DENIED.
The aforecited provisions of the Tennessee Code Annotated provide no authority for discovery in a United States District Court. Brady v. Maryland (1963), 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215,…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Michael A. LipscombCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Perlie Donald Workman, United States of America v. Jeffrey WorkmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Patrick J. Welsh, Harold Dillon, Larry Darwin Ellis, and John O. HolleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. ThurmanDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2013
- United States v. WileyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.