Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Glidden v. Fowler

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.

The theory of the relator is that the circuit court for Columbia county has no jurisdiction to do anything but to return the money; that the court acted without and beyond its jurisdiction in impounding the money until . such time as an action could be begun and prosecuted and the issues determined.

The principal question raised is: Did the circuit court for Columbia county act in excess of and beyond its jurisdiction in directing the clerk of the circuit court for Columbia county to retain in his hands the sum of $1,500 until the ownership of the fund should be established?

The provisions of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People, Ex Rel. Gilbert v. . LaidlawNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. State v. OwensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  3. Mundell v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Wright & Taylor v. DoughertySupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  5. McDonald v. AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. BANKERS'MORTG. CO. OF TOPEKA, KAN. v. McCombCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  2. State v. IglesiasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. EcholsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  4. State v. AltoneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1944
  5. Gentilli v. BrennanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API