Legal Opinion

State v. Echols

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 23, 1993No. 75393PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Clarence Kellerman and Kelvin Keller-man filed an action to set aside a bond forfeiture and requested the return to them of $100,000 which they had furnished for Alan Echols to post a cash bond. The court denied relief. The Kellermans have appealed, contending that the condition of the bond was satisfied when Echols appeared for trial and the court did not have authority to allow Echols to remain at large after the return of the verdict. Following opinion by the Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District, 1 this Court granted transfer. Rule 83.03. Affirmed.

On October 20, 1990, Alan Echols…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mundell v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. People v. CastroNew York Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State ex rel. Glidden v. FowlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Echols v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  3. Perry v. AversmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Holleran v. HolleranMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Royal Consulate of Kingdom of Saudi Arabia v. PullanUtah Supreme Court · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API