Legal Opinion

Ficker v. Diefenbach

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 22, 1978No. 167-559, CA 8956PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment for plaintiff entered in a Forcible Entry and Detainer (FED) proceeding. 1 Plaintiff has not appeared in this court.

Commencing in October, 1971, defendant rented, on a month-to-month basis, a house owned by plaintiff. The chimney on the house had a crack in it as a result of the Columbus Day storm in 1962. Starting October 1, 1972, and on each October 1 through October 1, 1976, defendant sent a letter to plaintiff complaining of the cracked chimney, stating that it constituted a fire danger. The assessed value of the property for tax purposes was increased to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Urban Renewal Agency v. LackeyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Williams v. JoyceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  3. L & M Investment Co. v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. L & M Investment Co. v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  2. L & M Investment Co. v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. Ficker v. DiefenbachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  4. Timberlee Apartments v. AbleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API