L & M Investment Co. v. Morrison
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtButtler, J.
This proceeding was commenced under the Forcible Entry and Detainer statutes (ORS 105.105-105.150), but defendants asserted affirmative defenses and counter-claims under the Oregon Residential Landlord and Tenant Act (ORLTA; ORS 91.700-91.895), on the basis of which the trial court, sitting without a jury, determined that plaintiff was not entitled to possession, and that defendants were entitled to continued possession, to damages, and to a mandatory injunction requiring plaintiff to make certain repairs to the premises, and that until such repairs were completed the rental would be reduced…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cal-Roof Wholesale, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Ficker v. DiefenbachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
3Cited by8 opinions
- L & M Investment Co. v. MorrisonOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- L & M Investment Co. v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Ficker v. DiefenbachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- L & M Investment Co. v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Skourtes v. SchaerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.