Legal Opinion

L & M Investment Co. v. Morrison

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 8, 1978No. 166-925, CA 8310PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, J.

This proceeding was commenced under the Forcible Entry and Detainer statutes (ORS 105.105-105.150), but defendants asserted affirmative defenses and counter-claims under the Oregon Residential Landlord and Tenant Act (ORLTA; ORS 91.700-91.895), on the basis of which the trial court, sitting without a jury, determined that plaintiff was not entitled to possession, and that defendants were entitled to continued possession, to damages, and to a mandatory injunction requiring plaintiff to make certain repairs to the premises, and that until such repairs were completed the rental would be reduced…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cal-Roof Wholesale, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Ficker v. DiefenbachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. L & M Investment Co. v. MorrisonOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. L & M Investment Co. v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. Ficker v. DiefenbachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  4. L & M Investment Co. v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. Skourtes v. SchaerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API