Legal Opinion

Brickley v. Neuling

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1950PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHughes, J.

The trial court denied appellant’s application because she has no personal or property interest in the litigation. This appears to be literally true. Her petition sets forth that her husband died leaving no property except that which was held in joint tenancy with her; and that no administrator or personal representative has been appointed by the probate courts of Illinois.

Respondents contend that the suits were properly brought and can be maintained against the defendant, even though deceased.

It is obvious that the respondents desire a valid judgment against the named defendant. The courts…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Combes v. KeyesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Baker v. McKnightOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Barnhart v. SchultzOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Jacob v. West Bend Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
  4. Noble v. CorkinConnecticut Superior Court · 1998
  5. Mollette v. Portsmouth City CouncilOhio Court of Appeals · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API