Legal Opinion

Barnhart v. Schultz

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1978No. 77-280PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam B. Brown, J.

The main issue raised by the instant cause is whether a complaint filed by a plaintiff before the deadline provided for by the statute of limitations but after the death of the only designated defendant meets the requirements of the statute of limitations.

It is established law in Ohio that the statute of limitations is not tolled by the death of a defendant if the *61cause of action has accrued prior to that death. Wrinkle v. Trabert (1963), 174 Ohio St. 233, 236; Granger’s Admr. v. Granger (1833), 6 Ohio 35; Bartlow v. Kinnard (1882), 38 Ohio St. 373. Since, in the instant cause, the only…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Thompson v. PeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Chandler v. DunlopMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  4. Brickley v. NeulingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Granger's Administrator v. GrangerOhio Supreme Court · 1833

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Patterson v. V & M Auto BodyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Baker v. McKnightOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Eberbach v. McNabneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. CitiMortgage, Inc. v. BumphusOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Levering v. Riverside Methodist HospitalOhio Court of Appeals · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API