Legal Opinion

Karl Tartt v. Wilson County, Tennessee

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 3, 2014No. 13-6603UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERNICE BOUIE DONALD, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Karl Tartt sued Wilson County, Tennessee for refusing to hire him under alleged discriminatory policies prohibited by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Tennessee Human Rights Act. In December 2008, Tartt submitted a job application to the Wilson County Animal Control department, indicating he was interested in “Animal Control/open position.” When the co-located Solid Waste Disposal department hired white applicants the following year, Tartt filed a Charge ■ of Discrimination against the County with the Equal Employment Opportunity…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McClain v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
  2. Ragland, II v. F & M Koz, IncDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API