Legal Opinion

Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. Hill

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 22, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The defendant in error, G. A. Hill, plaintiff below, brought an action in the Common Pleas Court of Stark county against Fairbanks, Morse & Company, and other defendants, the village of Brewster and certain of its officials, to enjoin the performance of a contract theretofore entered into, under the provisions of which Fairbanks, Morse & Company had agreed to sell to the village of Brewster generating equipment for a municipal electric light plant. The action was brought by Hill, as a taxpayer, by virtue of the provisions of Section 4314, General Code.

On appeal to this court a decree was…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carlson v. City of FaithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  2. In Re Application of WellhoferNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  3. City of Fostoria v. KleinhenOhio Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. Schureman v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API