Legal Opinion

City of Fostoria v. Kleinhen

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 19, 1944No. 463 and 467Published

1Opinion of the CourtJackson, J.

This matter is in this court on appeals on questions of law. It is to be noted that two separate appeals were taken.

In case No. 463 the errors complained of are based on the refusal of the Probate Court to consider a motion for a new trial and the dismissing of the motion without a hearing thereon by reason of an oral motion made by the appellee. Case No. 467 is based upon the action of the Probate Court in dismissing the motion of the appellant to vacate and set aside the judgment of the Probate Court by reason of an oral motion made by the appellee, without granting the appellant an…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Abicht, Exr. v. O'DonnellOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. WelshOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  3. The Wheeling Lake Erie Ry. Co. v. RichterOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  4. In re Estate of VanderlipMontgomery County Probate Court · 1943
  5. Bauer v. HeatonOhio Court of Appeals · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API