Legal Opinion

Bertolino v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1989No. 88-1703PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This court has original jurisdiction to issue writs of procedendo. Section 2(B)(1)(e), Article IV, Ohio Constitution. The writ is an extraordinary remedy and is an order from a court of superior jurisdiction to a tribunal of inferior jurisdiction, commanding the latter to proceed to judgment. State, ex rel. Garnett, v. Lyons (1975), 44 Ohio St. 2d 125, 73 O.O. 2d 440, 339 N.E. 2d 628. Such high writs have customarily been available to compel the Industrial Commission to act on a claim. See, e.g., State, ex rel. Cezkovsky, v. Indus. Comm. (1932), 126 Ohio St. 39, 40, 183 N.E. 865 (Marshall,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Kneisley v. Lattimer-Stevens Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Cleveland Ry. Co. v. HallidayOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  4. State ex rel. Garnett v. LyonsOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State ex rel. Smith v. FriedmanOhio Supreme Court · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. NakataHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Guenther v. Springfield Twp. TrusteesOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. State ex rel. Mignella v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State ex rel. Carpenter v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Cox v. Stolle Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API