Legal Opinion

Chapin v. Burks

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 21, 1930No. 669PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFunderburk, J.

This suit as originally brought was one by O. O. Chapin against P. L. Burks and Putnam Supply Company for the conversion of certain oil-well casing. As a basis for a Claim of exemplary damages it was alleged of the acts claimed to constitute a conversion that same were “unlawful, wilful, wanton and with the fraudulent intent to deprive the plaintiff of the value of said property, defendants knowing that said property did not belong to them or either of them, and knowing they had no lawful claim or right to seize said property and so retain and appropriate same.” Actual damages for tlie value…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Joske v. IrvineTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Texas v. HarringtonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  3. Hall Music Co. v. RobertsonTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  4. J. M. Radford Grocery Co. v. AndrewsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  5. Chicago, R. I. G. Ry. v. AbdouCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Langdon v. Progress Laundry & Cleaning Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  2. Putnam Supply Co. v. ChapinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Bryson v. FerrillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API