Legal Opinion

Ahearn v. Smith

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1926No. File Nos. 6262, 6269PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGates, P. J.

The appeal N,o. 6264 is from a judgment directing the superintendent of bank and the depositors’ guaranty fund commission to pay plaintiffs’ claim as the holder of a certificate of deposit in the State Bank of Winfred out of the moneys in the guaranty fund. Appeal No. 6268 is from an order denying defendants’ motion to modify the form of the judgment.

Upon the merits the sole question is whether the transaction, between plaintiff and the Farmers’ Savings Bank of Winfred, predecessor of the State Bank of Winfred, constituted- a deposit *635in good faith. The then_ superintendent allowed the claim…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Driscoll v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  2. McQuerry v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  3. In re Appeal of Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste. Marie RailroadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  4. State ex rel. Griffith v. BoneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Sharpe v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Muckler v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Lytle v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Dockstader v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Hillman v. RudenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API