Legal Opinion

Kolar v. County of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 27, 1976No. Civ. 45586PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ALLPORT, J.

Following trial of this action against the County of Los Angeles for wrongful death of their son, judgment on the verdict of the jury was entered in favor of Martin and Wreath Kolar in the sum of $25,000 plus costs. Thereafter an order was made granting defendant’s motion for a new trial. Plaintiffs appeal from that order and defendant cross-appeals from the judgment.

Contentions

It is contended on appeal by plaintiffs that defendant’s motion for new trial was in fact denied by operation of law and the judgment should be reinstated because the order granting the motion does…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Stevens v. Parke, Davis & Co.California Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Jiminez v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Sinz v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Shaw v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fergus v. SongerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Peninsula Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Resort Video, Ltd. v. Laser Video, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Ruiz v. RuizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Grant v. F. P. Lathrop Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API