Legal Opinion
Howard v. Blue Ridge Bank
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 29, 2005No. C 04-04619SIPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS, MOTION TO STRIKE, AND MOTION FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT
ILLSTON, District Judge.
On April 15, 2005, the Court heard oral argument on a motion to dismiss, motion to strike, and motion for a more definite statement filed by defendants Wells Fargo Financial Acceptance (“Wells Fargo”) and Blue Ridge Bank (“BRB”). Having carefully considered the arguments of counsel and the papers submitted, the Court hereby GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART defendants’ motions.
BACKGROUND
This case arises out of plaintiffs displeasure with…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sterling Usher v. City of Los Angeles, Richard A. Gonzales, Michael E. Melton, Jose E. Ramirez, Joe Rios, and Robert L. VannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Brown v. MortensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Beuster v. Equifax Information ServicesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2006
- Barnhill v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2005
- Miller v. Bank of America, National Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2012
- Sites v. Nationstar Mortgage LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.