Legal Opinion

Brown v. Mortensen

California Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 2011No. S180862PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

In this case we address the remedies available to a patient when a debt collector, acting on behalf of a medical professional, is asserted to have illegally disclosed confidential patient medical information to various consumer reporting agencies in the course of a dispute over an alleged medical debt.

Individuals, as patients, have a substantial interest in the privacy of their medical information. (Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn. (1994) 7 Cal.4th 1, 41 [26 Cal.Rptr.2d 834, 865 P.2d 633].) As consumers, they have substantial interests as well in the privacy and…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Harris v. Pac Anchor Transportation, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State Department of Public Health v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Sandquist v. Lebo Automotive, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Friends of Eel River v. North Coast Ry. Auth.California Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Jankey v. Song Koo LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API