Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 10, 1973No. 19Published

1Per curiam

The case on appeal contains no assignments of error. The appeal itself constitutes an exception to the judgment and presents for review any error appearing on the face of the record. State v. Cox, 281 N.C. 131, 187 S.E. 2d 785 (1972); State v. Elliott, 269 N.C. 683, 153 S.E. 2d 330 (1967). In the absence of proper exception and assignment of error, the judgment must be sustained unless error appears on the face of the record *118proper. State v. Bumgarner, 283 N.C. 388, 196 S.E. 2d 210 (1973); State v. Higgs, 270 N.C. 111, 153 S.E. 2d 781 (1967); State v. Williams, 268 N.C. 295, 150 S.E. 2d 447…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. WaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. State v. ElliottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. State v. HiggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API