Legal Opinion

Burrman v. Grand Trunk Western Railway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1906No. Docket No. 116PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Wayne; Frazer, J. Case by Charles Burrman against the Grand Trunk Western Railway for personal injuries. There was judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

Plaintiff, in November, 1901, sustained serious personal injury by being struck and run over by defendant’s work train at Swartz Creek, in this State. He was, with other workmen, engaged in making repairs to a switch on the railway tracks, and in crossing the south one of two of defendant’s tracks, constructed eight feet from each other, for the purpose of reaching a pile of *690splits, which were to be loaded upon a small car on the north track, was the last man to cross, was struck by a flat car, which, with the attached locomotive, was used in construction and had for some time been standing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. Flint & Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Carlson v. Cincinnati, Saginaw & Mackinaw RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. La Barre v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tober v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Hammond v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Baker v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API