Legal Opinion

Tober v. Pere Marquette Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1920No. Docket No. 47PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Berrien; White (Charles E.), J. Case by Adolph Tober against the Pere Marquette Railroad Company for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

Plaintiff Tober, a section hand in defendant’s employ, was struck and seriously injured by a switch engine in defendant’s yards at Benton Harbor while he was working on the track clearing snow from a switch, between 10 and 11 o’clock in the evening of December 9, 1917. It was a cold, stormy night with strong winds drifting the snow. As was customary when a storm was on and such conditions required it, section men, or track hands, were called out; to clear the switches of ice or drifted snow which impeded their operation. Tober worked that evening: with a fellow member of the section crew…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Aerkfetz v. HumphreysSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Crane v. ReederMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Connelley v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1912
  4. Morris v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  5. Harbaugh v. People ex rel. CicottMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hines v. SweeneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Bree v. JalbertNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  3. In Re Estate of BoeseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  4. Julio Diniero v. United States Lines CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  5. Watts v. Pere Marquette Railroad Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API