Arendas v. Rich & Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ROSENBERG, District Judge.
The plaintiff as the representative of an estate desires approval of her petition to settle this action. She here seeks to effect the settlement with the defendant without any allowance to the third-party defendant for payments of workmen’s compensation benefits to the widow and children of its deceased employee. The third-party defendant objects to such a settlement.
This case has already been tried by jury which rendered a verdict in favor of the defendant and the third-party defendant. The action was instituted by reason of the accidental death of the plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Furia v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Bumbarger v. BUMBARGERSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Meehan v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
3Cited by14 opinions
- Baio v. Commercial Union InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
- Bigley v. Unity Auto Parts, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Brown v. LeightonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Curtis v. Simpson ChevroletDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Shaw v. Cambridge Integrated Services Group, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.