Legal Opinion

Meehan v. Philadelphia

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 18, 1957No. Appeal, 160PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

Philip A. Meehan, a Philadelphia policeman, was incapacitated by injuries received on August 26, 1951, when on duty in a patrol car which collided with an automobile driven by Lester Beckman.

Our present problem is whether the City of Philadelphia is to receive credit, on a workmen’s compensation judgment, for the sum the policeman received when he settled a trespass action against Beckman.

When a policeman is injured in the performance of his duties and temporarily incapacitated, the Act of June 28, 1935, P. L. 477, 53 PS §637 requires the city • to pay his full rate of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Maio v. FahsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Socha v. MetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Smith v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Furia v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Haefele v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Topelski v. Universal South Side Autos, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Winfree v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. RombergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Stark v. Posh Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Bumbarger v. BUMBARGERSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API