Legal Opinion

Nabholz Construction Corp. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided January 25, 2005No. 4:04-cv-00093PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER RULING ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

EISELE, District Judge.

The case is before the Court on Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. Also before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss filed by Third-party Defendant Mid-Continent Casualty Company (“Mid-Continent”). For the reasons stated below, the Court concludes that judgment as a matter of law must be entered in favor of Defendant St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company. The Court’s ruling likely renders moot Mid-Continent’s request for dismissal of the Third-Party Complaint.

FACTS WITHOUT MATERIAL CONTROVERSY

This case arises out of an…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Weedo v. Stone-E-Brick, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  4. Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. Chester-O'Donley & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  5. Pursell Construction, Inc. v. Hawkeye-Security Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lennar Corp. v. Great American Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
  2. Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Motorists Mutual Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Essex Insurance v. HolderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  4. Ohio N. Univ. v. Charles Constr. Servs., Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Westfield Insurance v. Custom Agri Systems, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API