Nabholz Construction Corp. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RULING ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
EISELE, District Judge.
The case is before the Court on Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. Also before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss filed by Third-party Defendant Mid-Continent Casualty Company (“Mid-Continent”). For the reasons stated below, the Court concludes that judgment as a matter of law must be entered in favor of Defendant St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company. The Court’s ruling likely renders moot Mid-Continent’s request for dismissal of the Third-Party Complaint.
FACTS WITHOUT MATERIAL CONTROVERSY
This case arises out of an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Weedo v. Stone-E-Brick, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. Chester-O'Donley & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- Pursell Construction, Inc. v. Hawkeye-Security Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Lennar Corp. v. Great American Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
- Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Motorists Mutual Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2010
- Essex Insurance v. HolderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
- Ohio N. Univ. v. Charles Constr. Servs., Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- Westfield Insurance v. Custom Agri Systems, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.