Legal Opinion
McMahan's Furniture Co. v. City of Pacific Grove
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 4, 1963No. Civ. 20627PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDraper, P. J.
Defendants, a charter city and its officials, appeal from decree permanently enjoining enforcement of those portions of an ordinance which prohibit erection and maintenance of any sign which projects more than 24 inches from the building to which it is attached or extends more than 14 inches over a public way. Plaintiffs are merchants whose businesses have overhanging signs exceeding these limits, all hut one erected before adoption of the ordinance in 1955. All have exhausted their administrative remedies by applying for variances. It is stipulated that the city has denied all applications…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lockard v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- City of Los Angeles v. GageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Allied Properties v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- National Advertising Co. v. County of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Franklin Furniture Co. v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Carlin v. City of Palm SpringsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Gawzner Corp. v. MinierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Coast-United Advertising, Inc. v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1993