Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Knickerbocker

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 1974No. Civ. 31610PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROUSE, J.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory judgment of dissolution of marriage. Appellant alleges error on the part of the trial court in its finding that certain realty is the separate property of respondent; in failing to award spousal support to appellant; and in rendering a judgment which was not sufficiently certain so as to permit its enforcement.

Appellant and respondent were married in the State of Illinois on June 16, 1951. Respondent had been married before and had been awarded a residence and certain household goods upon the termination of her prior marriage.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ernst v. SearleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. In Re Marriage of LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. See v. SeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Thomasset v. ThomassetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FinkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. In Re Marriage of MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. In Re Marriage of StephensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. In Re Marriage of EastisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. In Re Marriage of DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API