Legal Opinion

Azarian v. Witte

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 4, 2001No. 812PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKrauser, J.

The “attesting expert provision”1 of the Maryland Health Care Malpractice Claims Act (the “Act”)2 provides that all claimants under the Act must file a “certificate of a qualified expert,” more commonly known as “a certificate of merit,”3 in which an expert attests that “a departure from the standard of care” by the defendant health care provider was the proximate cause of the claimant’s medical injury. That provision, howev*75er, limits who may make such an attestation by stating that an “attesting expert may not devote annually more than 20 percent of the expert’s professional activities to…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Heat & Power Corp. v. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. Attorney General v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  3. State v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  4. Frost v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Witte v. AzarianCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  2. Kearney v. BergerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. Fagerhus v. Host Marriott Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Azarian v. WitteCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Port v. CowanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API