Legal Opinion

McAdam v. Dynes

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1989No. Civ. 890072PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.

We granted Toby McAdam’s petition to review a decision of the North Dakota Temporary Court of Appeals affirming a summary judgment in favor of George T. Dynes. McAdam v. Dynes, 445 N.W.2d 25 (N.D.1988). We reverse and remand.

Without executing a written fee agreement, Dynes represented McAdam in a claim against West River Management for wrongful discharge under the Fair Labor Standards Act. McAdam and West River Management ultimately settled the matter for $15,800. According to Dynes, that representation of McAdam resulted in total attorney fees and out-of-pocket…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Larson v. BaerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Security State Bank v. SchultzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Mercy Hospital, Inc. v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  4. Tidball v. HetrickSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Delzer v. United Bank of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Matter of Estate of StarcherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Jones, Waldo, Holbrook & McDonough v. DawsonUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Richmond v. NodlandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API