Tidball v. Hetrick
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HENDERSON, Justice.
ACTION
This is an appeal by the defendants, La-Von W. Hetrick, Pierre Hetrick, and Tana Hetrick Hooten, from a judgment of the trial court holding that plaintiff, Keith A. Tidball, was entitled to recover attorney fees in accordance with a written contract for legal services. Farmers State Bank of Winner is not an appellant. We affirm.
FACTS
This was a court trial. Appellant-defendant LaVon Hetrick was an income beneficiary of twenty-five percent of her father A.J. Williams’ estate. LaVon’s children, Pierre Hetrick and Tana Hetrick Hooten, were residual beneficiaries of their…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Estate of HobelsbergerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
- Thomas v. Turner's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1890
- Egan v. BurnightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
- Estate of Williams v. WilliamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- McFarland v. HiltsleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by4 opinions
- Williams v. WaldmanNevada Supreme Court · 1992
- Poyzer v. McGrawSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
- In Re the Proceedings for Deposit in the Court of Monies and/or Trust Assets of the Equivalent Value of Approximately $45,877.68South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- McAdam v. DynesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989