Easton v. Bigley

Four demand promissory notes form the basis of the four causes of action contained in the complaint filed by C. A. Easton, in the superior court for King county, against Homer Bigley and Reva Bigley, his wife, on November 2, 1945. It was alleged that each of the four notes had been assigned by Barto & Company, a corporation, payee, to C. A. Easton, without recourse, and that plaintiff was the holder of each of such notes.

The note in the first cause of action was executed by Bigley and wife, in favor of Barto & Company, on September 9, 1937, and was for the principal sum of five hundred…