Legal Opinion
In Re the Welfare of S.A.M.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 28, 1997No. C8-97-367PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
On appeal from the district court’s adjudication of delinquency, S.A.M. challenges the admission of a videotape and the sufficiency of the evidence to support the assault adjudication. The district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the videotape, and the evidence was sufficient to prove the petition. We affirm.
FACTS
Following an incident on a Metropolitan Council Transit Organization (MCTO) bus, S.A.M., a juvenile, was charged by petition with assault in the second degree. At trial the state was unable to produce a witness who had observed the alleged…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. Antone R. White, A/K/A ToneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Midland Steel Products Co. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers, Local 486Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. BiasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Jenson v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Washington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- In re the Welfare of J.R.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. MoyleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Washington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.