Legal Opinion
In re the Welfare of J.R.M.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 19, 2002No. C9-02-474PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Appellant J.R.M. challenges (1) the sufficiency of the evidence to support his adjudication for the charge of possession of a small amount of marijuana, and (2) the district court’s disposition order that required appellant to undergo inpatient treatment.
FACTS
On October 8, 2001, Paul Karelis, a teacher at Worthington High School, looked out his window and saw three boys smoking across the street. The boys were 75 feet away so he could not identify what they were smoking, but because they were holding the object between their pinched fingers, Karelis did not think it…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. UlvinenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- O'MALLEY v. Ulland Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. BauerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. KnochCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. EnochCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- In Re JrmCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- In the Matter of the Welfare of: J. C. A., Jr., Child.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014