Legal Opinion

In Re Initiative Petition No. 348, State Question No. 640

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 20, 1992No. 76277PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*774LAVENDER, Justice.

This is an original action brought pursuant to 34 O.S.1981 § 8 challenging the legality of Initiative Petition 348, State Question 640 (Petition). The Petition purports to amend by the initiative process1 Article V, § 33 of the Oklahoma Constitution. The amendment would impose severe limitations upon the Legislature’s ability to raise new revenue.

We begin by emphasizing that our inquiry is limited to those challenges fundamental to the validity of the Petition as a whole. We will not attempt to resolve uncertainties ensuing from the interpretation or application of the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Gregory v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. City of Rome v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Kadderly v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1903

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Calvey v. DaxonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  2. In Re Initiative Petition No. 358, State Question No. 658Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. FENT v. FALLINSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  4. Oklahoma Automobile Dealers Ass'n v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  5. Gentges v. Oklahoma State Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API