FENT v. FALLIN
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
KAUGER, J.;
{ 1 The dispositive issue is the definition of "raising revenue" for purposes of art. 5 § 83 of the Okla. Const 1 The parties concede that if Senate Bill No. 1246 2 is a revenue bill subject to § 83, it failed to comply with the constitutional requirements for its enact ment. We hold that because the ballot title reveals that the measure was aimed at only bills "intended to raise revenue" and "revenue raising bills," the obvious meaning of raising revenue in this context is to increase revenue.
FACTS
2 Senate Bill No. 1246 (SB 1246/the bill) is a bill concerning the modification of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. RitterbuschSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Perry County v. Selma, Marion & Memphis RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
- Calvey v. DaxonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- In Re the Assessment of Personal Property Taxes Against Missouri Gas EnergySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Atkinson v. Halliburton Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- NAIFEH v. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSIONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- Oklahoma Automobile Dealers Ass'n v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- RICHARDSON v. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSIONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- The Institute For Responsible Alcohol Policy v. State ex rel. Alcohol Beverage Laws Enforcement Comm.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- OKLAHOMA AUTOMOBILE DEALERS ASSOC. v. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA TAX COMM.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.