Karchner v. Mumie
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
M!r. Justice McBride,
Plaintiff-wife sought compensatory and punitive damages in trespass for criminal conversation alleged to have occurred between defendant and plaintiff’s husband. The jury found for plaintiff and judgment was entered on the verdict.
On this appeal defendant contends that the plaintiff, being a married woman, has no right of action for criminal conversation. There is no appellate Pennsylvania authority on this point. Criminal conversation, at early common law, was an action brought by the husband against the other man with whom his wife committed adultery. The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Foot v. CardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1889
- Nolin v. PearsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Parker v. NewmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Antonelli v. XenakisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Gernerd v. GernerdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Barry J. Quinones v. United States of America, and United States Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs and Its Agents and EmployeesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Fadgen v. LenknerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Kline v. AnsellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Neuberg v. BobowiczSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Di Blasio v. KolodnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.