Legal Opinion

Highfield's Alignment Service v. Scott

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 16, 1993No. AV92000036PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Presiding Judge.

This is a workers’ compensation case. Following an ore tenus proceeding, the trial court found that Highfield’s Alignment Service (employer) intentionally interfered with the payment of the employee’s medical bills and that the employee was entitled to recover from the employer double workers’ compensation benefits pursuant to § 25-5-8(e), Code 1975, which provides:

“Penalties for failure to secure payment of compensation; injunctions.- — Any employer required to secure the payment of compensation under this section who fails to secure compensation shall be guilty of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Ex Parte CashSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Lynn v. Berg Mechanical, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Hendricks v. Motor Freight Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Argo Const. Co. v. RichCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RuggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  2. MasterBrand Cabinets, Inc. v. RuggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API