Legal Opinion

Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. McDonald

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 7, 1923No. 10,341PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

The plaintiff McDonald, a carpenter by occupation, living at Aurora, Colorado, held an accident and health policy of indemnity issued by the defendant company. Among other things it provides that any accidental injury to the insured, resulting in septicaemia, shall be classed and paid *310for as sickness or illness as set forth in paragraphs “H” and' VI”, which read:

“Part H. Confining Illness, Twenty-four dollars per week. For total disability of one day or more resulting from sickness originating after thirty days from date of this policy, and confining the insured continuously within doors,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rocci v. Massachusetts Accident Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Jennings v. Brotherhood Accident Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  3. Dulany v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
  4. Reeves v. Midland Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Great Eastern Casualty Co. v. RobinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. FerrellArizona Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Koncilja v. Trinity Universal Insurance CompanyColorado Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Wade v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Bankson v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  5. Benson v. State Automobile and Cas. UnderwritersColorado Court of Appeals · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API