Legal Opinion
Albrecht v. Rubinstein
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 2, 1948PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The plaintiff claimed to have been poisoned by food purchased from the defendant in the latter’s restaurant. He brought suit on three counts, the first on express contract, the second on implied contract and the third on negligence. The trial court directed a verdict for the defendant on the first two counts and the jury found for the defendant on the third count. The plaintiff appealed from the denial of his motion to set aside the verdict and from the judgment.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts: The plaintiff is a police officer of the city of Hartford. On June 14,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fairbank Canning Co. v. . MetzgerNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Santoro v. KleinbergerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Tileston v. UllmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Merrill v. HodsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- Cushing v. RodmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Breen v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Pierce v. AlbaneseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- State v. SulSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Epstein v. GiannattasioConnecticut Superior Court · 1963
- Bohenek v. NiedzwieckiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.