Legal Opinion
Epstein v. Giannattasio
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided December 10, 1963No. File No. 82912PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On or about 5 October, 1962, the plaintiff visited a beauty parlor, conducted by the defendant Giannattasio, for the purpose of receiving a beauty treatment. During the course of that treatment, Giannattasio used a product called "Zotos 30-day Color," manufactured by defendant Sales Affiliates, Inc., and a prebleach manufactured by defendant Clairol, Inc. The plaintiff claims that as a result of the treatment she suffered acute dermatitis, disfigurement resulting from loss of hair, and other injuries and damages.
The complaint sets forth two causes of action against each defendant, the first…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Perlmutter v. Beth David HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Aced v. Hobbs-Sesack Plumbing Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
- United Aircraft Corp. v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Kenney v. Wong LenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1925
- Gile v. Kennewick Public Hospital DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Frances M. Bonebrake, Administratrix De Bonis Non of the Estate of Woodrow B. Simek, Deceased v. Donald Cox and Claude Cox, D/B/A Tamarack BowlCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- Westinghouse Electric Co. v. Murphy, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Magrine v. KrasnicaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Elliott v. LachanceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969
- Burton v. Artery CompanyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.