Legal Opinion

Joachim v. Madison Dental Clinic

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1934PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

-The respondent, in endeavoring to collect a judgment which had been entered in his favor January 23, 1932, against one E'.'A. Prouty for $778.52, sought discovery of property belonging to Prouty and evidently intended to avail himself of the remedies afforded by sec. 273.02, Stats, *263The complaint and a temporary ■ injunction .were served on the appellant April 4, 1932. The order accompanying the summons and complaint directed the appellant to show cause why it should not refrain from transferring or-disposing-of any moneys, debts, or choses in action then belonging to the said Prouty, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hollins v. Brierfield Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Harrigan v. GilchristWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Cline v. WhitakerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Auer v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Weyerhaeuser v. EarleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stelloh v. LibanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. City of Madison v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  3. State v. MaasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Wallace v. MantheiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Joachim v. Wisconsin Dental Clinic, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API