Legal Opinion

City of Madison v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1958PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, C. J.

It is respondent’s position that in the absence of a bill of exceptions the questions before this court are whether the findings support the judgments and whether the ordinance is unconstitutional on its face.

No bill of exceptions has been settled. Appellant has submitted no appendix. The stipulations of fact filed in superior court are printed in appellant’s brief, together with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in all three cases, and the circuit court’s memorandum decision in Case No. 65. Appellant states in its brief:

“Since all the facts were stipulated in Cases 64 and 66 and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pauly v. KeeblerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District v. Committee on Water PollutionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Dick v. HeislerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Jorgenson v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Josam Manufacturing Co. v. State Board of HealthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Stelloh v. LibanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. State Ex Rel. Skinkis v. TreffertCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
  4. Denny v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  5. J & N Corp. v. City of Green BayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API