Legal Opinion
Lienhart v. Dryvit Systems, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided June 26, 2001No. 00-908PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Vacated and remanded with instructions by published opinion. Judge WILLIAMS wrote the opinion, in which Judge WIDENER and Judge WILKINS joined.
OPINION
WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge:
Dryvit Systems, Inc. petitions for review, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f), of the district court’s certification of a plaintiff class of homeowners who allege that Dryvit’s stucco siding product, “Fastrak System 4000” (Fastrak), was negligently designed and that Dryvit failed to warn purchasers of the product’s alleged defects. This Circuit has not yet had occasion to articulate the standard governing…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In Re American Medical Systems, Inc. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Valentino v. Carter-Wallace, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- In the Matter of Rhone-Poulenc Rorer IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- John H. Isaacs v. Sprint CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Soutter v. Equifax Information Services, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
- In re Titanium Dioxide Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- DiFelice v. US Airways, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
- Morris v. Wachovia Securities, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.