Legal Opinion

Walker v. Broderick

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtValente, J.

Plaintiffs as individual suitors bring action against defendant as an individual. Plaintiffs allege in the amended complaint that plaintiffs were stockholders of the Bank of the United States at a time when it was solvent; that while the bank was solvent defendant took office as Superintendent of Banks and thereafter was negligent in two respects:(1) He wholly failed to perform certain acts with the performance of which he was charged by statute. This negligence by omission is alleged in paragraphs 8, 9, 10 and 14.(2) He performed certain duties imposed by statute in a negligent way. This…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Robinson v. . ChamberlainNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  4. Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance v. Village of KeesevilleNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. Litchfield v. . BondNew York Court of Appeals · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Madsen v. BorthickUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Broderick v. AdamsonNew York Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Wollitzer v. National Title Guaranty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Broderick v. AdamsonNew York Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Veatch v. BroderickNew York Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API