Legal Opinion

Wollitzer v. National Title Guaranty Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCropsey, J.

The actions are similar in character. In each the plaintiff seeks to enjoin the defendants from practicing law. The prayer for relief also asks that defendants be punished as for contempt of court, but the plaintiff’s brief indicates that he is not seeking that relief.

The defendants answered the complaints and then moved for judgment dismissing the actions on the ground that the complaints did not set forth a cause of action. In support of this the defendants make two contentions: First,that no acts are alleged which constitute the practice of law, and second, that even if such facts were…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Matter of RoussNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Matter of Co-Operative Law Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Callanan v. . GilmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  4. People v. . Title Guarantee Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. Brooklyn City Railroad v. WhalenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. Illinois Adjustment Finance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1945
  2. Duncan & Hill Realty, Inc. v. Department of StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. In Re Application of DoddSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
  4. Caso v. GotbaumNew York Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Delaware Optometric Ass'n v. SherwoodCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API