Legal Opinion

Succession of Curtis

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 28, 1926No. 27199PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrunot, J.

Mrs. Harriet M. Curtis died, leaving an estate consisting of real and personal property. An alleged will was probated, but it was successfully attacked. A suit was then filed in which the title to two pieces of real estate was- involved, both of which were finally decreed to belong to the succession, and the present suit for a partition of the estate' followed. The real issue in this case is whether Mrs. Elizabeth M. Ryder, deceased, was the legitimate daughter of the late Mrs. Harriet M. Curtis.

The admitted facts are that Harriet M. Curtis was married to Michael F. Rogers, and the sole issue…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Teter v. TeterIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Franklin v. LeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Ingersol v. McWillieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
  4. Shuman v. ShumanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Godfrey v. RowlandHawaii Supreme Court · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Succession of KneippSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  2. In Re Gray's SuccessionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  3. Stokes v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
  4. Cameron v. Rowland.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  5. Cameron v. RowlandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API